VGTU talpykla > Fundamentinių mokslų fakultetas / Faculty of Fundamental Sciences > Moksliniai straipsniai / Research articles >

Lietuvių   English
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.vgtu.lt/handle/1/3694

Title: Evaluation of quality assurance in contractor contracts by multi-attribute decision-making methods
Authors: Trinkūnienė, Eva
Podvezko, Valentinas
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
Jokšienė, Izolda
Vinogradova, Irina
Trinkūnas, Vaidotas
Keywords: Contract evaluation
FAHP
EDAS
Entropy weight
CILOS
IDOCRIW
Analysis methods
Quality assurance
MADM
Issue Date: 2017
Publisher: Routledge-Taylor & Francis
Citation: Trinkūnienė, E.; Podvezko, V.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Jokšienė, I.; Vinogradova, I.; Trinkūnas, V. 2017. Evaluation of quality assurance in contractor contracts by multi-attribute decision-making methods, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 30(1): 1152–1180
Series/Report no.: 30;1
Abstract: The goal of this paper is to compare quality assurance in different contractor contracts by means of multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) and to select the best option. For this investigation, the authors have developed the complex of quality evaluation criteria. During experimental evaluation, the significance of criteria was determined and the expert evaluation of template construction contracts was performed. The complex comparison of contractor contracts was carried out by means of the following MADM methods: Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) as well as the new Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS). MADM. method. To determine the weights of criteria, with due consideration of uncertainty of expert evaluation, the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) method was applied. Evaluation of the data structure was performed by methods for the determination of objective weights: an entropy method and new criteria impact loss (CILOS) and integrated determination of objective criteria weights (IDOCRIW) methods. Expert subjective and objective weights were combined into aggregate weights. Based on the investigation performed, the authors make conclusions regarding possibilities for improving quality assurance in contractor contracts.
URI: http://dspace.vgtu.lt/handle/1/3694
ISSN: 1331-677X
Appears in Collections:Moksliniai straipsniai / Research articles

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Evaluation of quality assurance in contractor contracts by multi attribute decision making methods.pdf2.24 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback